Key Takeaways
- Impediments are anything blocking or significantly slowing team progress, including physical, dependency-related, or skill-related blockers
- Servant leaders prioritize removing obstacles that hinder team performance rather than controlling team work
- Not all impediments require project manager intervention - teams should be empowered to resolve what they can
- Escalation paths should be used for blockers outside the project manager's authority or unresolvable by the team
- Impediments should be prioritized based on their impact on critical path tasks and high-risk activities
Removing Impediments
Addressing and removing impediments, obstacles, and blockers is Task 7 of the People Domain. When team members encounter barriers that slow or stop their progress, the project manager must act swiftly to clear the path. This is servant leadership in action - putting the team's needs first by ensuring they have what they need to succeed.
What Are Impediments?
Impediments (also called obstacles or blockers) are anything that prevents the team from making progress or significantly slows them down.
Types of Impediments
| Type | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Physical | Tangible barriers | Waiting for equipment, unavailable workspace, broken tools |
| Dependency-Related | Waiting on others | Pending approvals, work from other teams, external vendor deliveries |
| Skill-Related | Competency gaps | No one has the required expertise, training needed |
| Process-Related | Bureaucratic barriers | Complex approval workflows, excessive documentation |
| Technical | Technology issues | System outages, integration problems, performance issues |
| Resource | Insufficient resources | Budget constraints, understaffing, competing priorities |
| Organizational | Company-level barriers | Conflicting policies, unclear authority, political resistance |
The Servant Leader Approach
In servant leadership, removing impediments is a primary responsibility. The project manager serves the team by ensuring obstacles are cleared.
Servant Leadership vs. Traditional Management
| Traditional Manager | Servant Leader |
|---|---|
| Controls team work | Facilitates team success |
| Directs what to do | Asks "what do you need?" |
| Team serves manager's goals | Manager serves team's needs |
| Takes credit for success | Gives credit to team |
| Blames team for failures | Takes accountability |
Key Mindset Shifts
- From "What have you done?" to "What's in your way?"
- From directing work to removing barriers
- From solving problems for the team to enabling the team to solve problems
Identifying Impediments
Impediments must be identified before they can be addressed. Common discovery methods include:
Proactive Identification
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| Daily Stand-ups | Team members report blockers each day |
| Retrospectives | Team reflects on obstacles encountered |
| One-on-Ones | Individual conversations surface issues |
| Observation | Notice when work is slowing or stopping |
| Impediment Boards | Visual tracking of known blockers |
Questions to Uncover Impediments
- "What's preventing you from making progress?"
- "What would help you work more effectively?"
- "Is there anything blocking the team?"
- "What frustrations are you experiencing?"
- "What do you need that you don't have?"
Prioritizing Impediments
Not all blockers have equal impact. Prioritization ensures the most critical impediments are addressed first.
Prioritization Criteria
| Criterion | High Priority If... |
|---|---|
| Critical Path Impact | Blocker affects tasks on the critical path |
| Number of People Affected | Multiple team members are blocked |
| Risk Level | Impediment threatens project success |
| Duration | Blocker has persisted for a long time |
| Escalating Consequences | Impact worsens if not addressed quickly |
Prioritization Matrix
| Impact | Urgency | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| High | High | Immediate action |
| High | Low | Schedule soon |
| Low | High | Address quickly but simply |
| Low | Low | Monitor or defer |
Resolution Approaches
Not every impediment requires the same approach. The servant leader must choose the appropriate intervention level.
Team Self-Resolution
When to empower the team:
- Team has the skills and authority to resolve
- Resolution builds team capability
- Impediment is within team's scope
How to support:
- Provide guidance without taking over
- Offer resources the team needs
- Check in on progress
Direct Resolution
When the project manager should act:
- Team lacks authority or access
- Speed is critical
- Cross-functional coordination needed
- Organizational barriers require senior intervention
Actions:
- Negotiate with other managers
- Secure resources
- Remove bureaucratic barriers
- Make decisions within authority
Escalation
When to escalate:
- Blocker is beyond your authority
- Resolution requires executive decision
- Significant budget or scope impact
- Ongoing conflict with other departments
Escalation Best Practices:
- Clearly describe the impediment and its impact
- Explain what has already been tried
- Propose possible solutions
- Specify what decision or action is needed
Escalation Paths
Common Escalation Points
| Level | When to Use | Types of Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Project Sponsor | Major decisions, scope changes | Budget, scope, strategic direction |
| Steering Committee | Cross-project issues, governance | Priorities, resource conflicts |
| Functional Managers | Resource availability | Team member assignments |
| PMO | Process issues, methodology | Standards, templates, tools |
| Executive Leadership | Organizational barriers | Policy changes, strategic conflicts |
Escalation Is Not Failure
Escalation is a legitimate project management tool, not a sign of weakness. Senior leaders have the authority and influence to remove barriers that project managers cannot. However:
- Don't escalate trivial issues
- Attempt resolution before escalating
- Provide clear information and recommendations
- Follow up on escalated items
Impediment Management Process
Ongoing Impediment Tracking
| Step | Activity |
|---|---|
| 1. Capture | Record impediments when identified |
| 2. Assess | Determine impact and priority |
| 3. Assign | Identify who will address it |
| 4. Act | Take resolution actions |
| 5. Follow Up | Verify resolution and close |
Visual Management
Many teams use impediment boards or blocker logs:
| Impediment | Impact | Owner | Status | Next Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server access pending | 3 devs blocked | PM | In progress | Follow up with IT today |
| Unclear requirements | Sprint at risk | PO | Escalated | Meeting with stakeholder |
| Missing test data | Testing delayed | QA Lead | Open | Request from data team |
Common Impediment Patterns
| Pattern | Description | Solution Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Approval Bottlenecks | Waiting on slow approvers | Pre-negotiate authority, escalate |
| Resource Conflicts | Multiple projects need same people | Work with PMO, prioritize |
| Technical Debt | Legacy issues slowing work | Allocate time for remediation |
| Knowledge Silos | Only one person has the skills | Cross-training, documentation |
| Environmental Issues | Tools, systems, workspace problems | IT support, workspace improvements |
Key Points for the PMP Exam
- Impediments block or slow team progress - they must be actively managed
- Servant leadership focuses on removing obstacles for the team
- Not all impediments require PM intervention - empower teams when appropriate
- Prioritize based on impact - address critical path and high-risk blockers first
- Escalate when necessary - use sponsors and executives for barriers beyond your authority
- Track and follow up - ensure impediments are actually resolved
During a daily stand-up, a team member mentions they have been waiting three days for access to a critical testing environment. What should the servant leader do first?
A team identifies multiple impediments during their retrospective. How should the project manager prioritize which to address first?
An impediment has been escalated to the project sponsor but remains unresolved after two weeks. The team is now significantly impacted. What should the project manager do?