Key Takeaways
- Tuckman's model identifies five stages of team development: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, and Adjourning
- The Storming stage involves conflicts over roles and approaches and requires the most leadership effort
- Teams may regress to earlier stages when membership changes, new tasks are assigned, or leadership changes occur
- A team charter establishes ground rules, decision-making processes, and expected behaviors
- Virtual teams require additional attention to communication, trust-building, and team cohesion
Building a Team
Building an effective team is one of the project manager's most important responsibilities. Task 6 of the People Domain focuses on appraising team member skills, acquiring team resources, and understanding team development dynamics. High-performing teams don't happen by accident - they are deliberately built and nurtured.
Tuckman's Stages of Team Development
Tuckman's Ladder, developed by psychologist Bruce Tuckman in 1965 (with a fifth stage added in 1977), describes the typical progression teams experience as they form, work together, and eventually disband.
The Five Stages
| Stage | Team Behavior | Leader Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Forming | Polite, cautious, uncertain | Provide direction and clarity |
| Storming | Conflict, competition, frustration | Manage conflict, clarify roles |
| Norming | Cooperation, trust, cohesion | Support emerging team norms |
| Performing | High productivity, interdependence | Delegate, remove obstacles |
| Adjourning | Completion, celebration, transition | Recognize contributions, transition |
Stage 1: Forming
Characteristics:
- Team members are uncertain about roles, rules, and expectations
- Behavior is polite but cautious
- Individuals focus on getting to know one another
- Low productivity as team orients
What Happens:
- Members test boundaries and relationships
- Dependence on the leader for guidance
- Individuals wonder: "How do I fit in?" "What's expected of me?"
- Little conflict on the surface (but uncertainty underneath)
Leadership Approach:
- Provide clear direction and structure
- Define roles, responsibilities, and objectives
- Establish initial ground rules
- Facilitate introductions and team-building activities
- Set expectations and answer questions
Stage 2: Storming
Characteristics:
- Conflict emerges as individuals assert themselves
- Competition over roles, ideas, and influence
- Resistance to tasks and leadership
- Frustration and tension are common
What Happens:
- Members challenge each other and the leader
- Subgroups may form
- Productivity may decrease as focus shifts to conflict
- Some members may withdraw or dominate
Leadership Approach:
- This stage requires the most leadership effort
- Facilitate open discussions about conflicts
- Use the team charter to establish/reinforce ground rules
- Help the team work through disagreements constructively
- Avoid taking sides; remain neutral and supportive
- Normalize conflict as part of team development
Important: Many teams get stuck in storming. Without effective facilitation, the team may not progress to higher performance.
Stage 3: Norming
Characteristics:
- Team finds its footing and establishes working patterns
- Conflicts are resolved or minimized
- Trust and cohesion develop
- Team members appreciate each other's strengths
What Happens:
- Collaboration increases
- Agreement on how to work together
- Members take responsibility for team success
- A sense of unity emerges
Leadership Approach:
- Support emerging team norms
- Step back from directing and focus on facilitating
- Encourage continued collaboration
- Reinforce positive behaviors
- Begin to delegate more responsibility
Stage 4: Performing
Characteristics:
- High productivity and effectiveness
- True interdependence among team members
- Flexibility and mutual support
- Focus on achieving goals
What Happens:
- Team operates efficiently with minimal supervision
- Members adapt to help each other
- Problems are solved collaboratively
- Both personal and team achievement are high
Leadership Approach:
- Delegate significantly
- Focus on removing obstacles (servant leadership)
- Provide resources and support
- Trust the team to manage themselves
- Celebrate successes
Note: Not all teams reach the Performing stage. It requires successfully navigating through earlier stages.
Stage 5: Adjourning
Characteristics:
- Project completion and team dissolution
- Sense of closure (and sometimes loss)
- Transition to other assignments
What Happens:
- Team completes final deliverables
- Relationships wind down
- Members may feel sadness or relief
- Knowledge transfer and lessons learned
Leadership Approach:
- Recognize and celebrate team achievements
- Conduct lessons learned / retrospectives
- Help with transition planning
- Provide references and feedback
- Maintain relationships for future collaboration
Teams Don't Always Progress Linearly
| Trigger | Effect |
|---|---|
| New member joins | May return to Forming or Storming |
| Member leaves | Team dynamics shift, possible regression |
| New tasks assigned | May trigger Storming over new approaches |
| Leadership changes | Often returns team to earlier stages |
| External pressure | Can disrupt established norms |
Teams may also oscillate between stages, particularly between Norming and Storming as new challenges arise.
Building the Team: Practical Steps
1. Skill Assessment
Before building the team, understand what skills are needed:
| Assessment Area | Questions |
|---|---|
| Technical Skills | What technical competencies does the project require? |
| Domain Knowledge | What business or industry expertise is needed? |
| Soft Skills | What interpersonal and communication skills are important? |
| Experience Level | What mix of senior and junior members is appropriate? |
2. Resource Acquisition
Obtaining the right team members:
| Source | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Internal Staff | Availability, competing priorities, skills match |
| External Hiring | Time to hire, cost, cultural fit |
| Contractors | Flexibility, expertise, integration challenges |
| Outsourcing | Cost, quality, communication, time zones |
3. Team Charter
A team charter is a document that establishes the team's operating agreements.
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Team Purpose | Why the team exists, what it will accomplish |
| Ground Rules | Expected behaviors and norms |
| Decision-Making Process | How decisions are made |
| Communication Guidelines | Meeting cadence, channels, response times |
| Conflict Resolution | How disagreements will be handled |
| Roles and Responsibilities | Who does what |
4. Virtual Team Considerations
Virtual and distributed teams face additional challenges:
| Challenge | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Communication gaps | Establish clear protocols, over-communicate |
| Trust building | Schedule face-to-face time (virtual or in-person) |
| Time zones | Rotate meeting times, respect working hours |
| Isolation | Create social connection opportunities |
| Cultural differences | Acknowledge and discuss openly |
Key Points for the PMP Exam
- Tuckman's stages: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, Adjourning
- Storming requires the most leadership effort - expect conflict
- Teams can regress when membership or circumstances change
- Not all teams reach Performing - it takes successful navigation of earlier stages
- Team charters establish ground rules and operating agreements
- Virtual teams need extra attention to communication and trust
A project team has been working together for several weeks. Recently, team members have started arguing about the technical approach and challenging each other's ideas. Which stage of team development is the team most likely in?
A high-performing team has just added two new members. What is the most likely impact on team dynamics?
What is the primary purpose of a team charter?